"Insanity is doing prompting the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
Any conversation
Spotted this Royal Air Force A400 over the lake yesterday, it was so different from civil planes www.planespotters.net/โฆ/zm420-royal-air-force-โฆatlas-c1-a400m-180
At moms house for the holiday weekend so the kids can see Nana. She has a "premium Plex" account on her tv serving a truly massive amount of content. Allegedly the brother of a long time friend is offering the "service". She says that the service will go down when the host is having outages, so the infra is likely local.
I brought my year this weekend. We are going to dig in to this guys operation. Intuition dictates that there is some hand rolled accounting going on. I'd like to see it.
"200K lines is not 10 times as much as 20K lines - from the mission perspective it's just irrelevant. And yet it's the easiest thing to measure. And so we look for the keys under the lamp post." ~Kent Beck
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8fBgDCf2Y4&t=2753s
๐ฒ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐๐ฟ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ยท๐๐ฑ๐๐พ๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฏ๐ช๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐น๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ ๐ท๐๐ด-๐๐ฎ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฑ๐๐ฉ๐ฏ.
Iโm assuming is not supported for auto-translation.
nope, google translate doesnโt support it :( looks beautiful though
Hmm, maybe Iโll sometimes post in Shavian anyway and translate myself. Itโs a skill Iโm trying to practice but rarely otherwise write brief enough notes to be so inclined.
๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ฅ, ๐ฅ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ ๐ฒ๐ค ๐๐ณ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ด๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ ยท๐๐ฑ๐๐พ๐ฏ ๐ง๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฑ ๐ฏ ๐๐ฎ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฑ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ง๐ค๐. ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ค ๐ฒ๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐จ๐๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ณ๐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ณ๐๐ผ๐ข๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ณ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐๐ด ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฒ๐ฏ๐.
(Opinion) People donโt like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on โAI music banned from top 40 chart in Australiaโ and people had very strong opinions in both directions.
The hot take: If youโre ok with someoneโs creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same.
If โAI made this and I call it mineโ is bad but โsomeone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mineโ and itโs suddenly ok, time to self reflect.
โฆ
My hot take: from the moment you use technology, be it an instrument, a synthesizer, a DAW, and now AI, it is still your idea, your effort, your time spent, and that makes it yours. Others can do the same if they choose. The same way someone chooses a classic guitar over a synthesizer, one can choose an AI over (insert ancient way of doing things).
โฆ
Youโre rolling the dice whenever you are searching for a sample or a preset in a synthesizer. Eventually itโs what โsounds goodโ, so still the effort is your judgement and the time spent finding that โdice rollโ that sounded well.
I am not a musician, so I lack the jargon to properly explain what I mean.
I used AI for creative writing (nothing too fancy, TTRPG). There, the broader the dice roll, the more generic and uninteresting the results. Slop, if you will. It was surprisingly good to build up on ideas I had however.
I imagine muisic also has building blocks. Melodies, instruments, mixing, etc. AI can perhaps be used in a similar fashion there.
I heard a perspective I sort of like: if AI is a tool then acceptable AI use is, more or less, defined as "when my audience no longer notices or cares". It's dynamic like that. Bad photoshop is detectable and annoying, so are overusing presets. Your artistry needs to expand to meet the tool.
I don't know if I 100% like that or agree. At the same time, it's a pretty straightforward line, a practical take.
