any · textlog

wrote:

whats the point of url shorteners in 2026

…

replied to:

I think short urls are still memorable and good. My phone doesn't surrogate all of my recall.

replied to:

Short URLs are good. Memorable URLs are good. URLs spat out by URL shorteners are something entirely different.

replied to:

Ah, the randomly generated ones. Yeah, agreed.

replied to:

The longer the text you need to store, the bigger a QR code needs to be in order to scan reliably. Also, you might be more confident in being able to keep a short URL stable (it's already a step of indirection, so if you want to reorg your site you can just update where the short URL points to). But people don't really take care to maintain short URLs anyway, apparently.

…

replied to:

Counting clicks, although probably not all that accurate with bot clicks

continued:

Also Short.io gives you a sub domain which is pretty nice adamspaul.short.gy/notes

wrote:

The government welds your door shut and then outlaws starting a business and living in McMansions, cars, skyscrapers, and tiny homes. The governments bans body odor and then closes stores and bans delivery services. The state closes bathrooms and then outlaws public urination. The government closes the border and then arrests tourists for overstaying their visas.

wrote:

Theory reuse > code reuse almost every time.

wrote:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.

replied to:

A good start for one of those "missing 411" videos on YT.

wrote:

Applied to an L5 software engineering role via e-mail and without any other contact I received back a bunch of questions that clearly look like they're aimed at L6 or even L7. Not sure what to do with that so I withdrew. Briefly considered answering them but was weirded out.

wrote:

Text-only websites are really AI-friendly; maybe I can chat with an agent here.

wrote:

what are ya'lls favorite wikipedia page? I myself is partial to the 'variations' entry for high fives

…

replied to:

You should check my other site onlycats.cc i think you will enjoy!

replied to:

love it. great concept

replied to:

still five hops to Hitler

(deleted post)

replied to(deleted account):

A little late for that :p

continued:

Fantastic contributions, thank you all!!!

…

replied to:

Catastrophic interference is also a favorite Wikipedia page and concept. The thing is, it doesn’t only happen to artificial neural networks, I’ve had it happen to me a few times. Especially with pin numbers, newer pins overwriting old ones and I’m always scared when I’m having hard time remembering something that this catastrophic interference applied and now the information is gone from my brain.

wrote:

azért aranyos, hogy egyből sandbox-ba kell tenni (a Virtualbox egy sandbox), hogy szét ne barmoljon mindent a gépen vagy a szerveren, vagy máshol, azért alapvetően békés kis állatkák ezek az ai chatbotok, na

It's cute because you have to put it in a sandbox right away (Virtualbox is a sandbox) so it doesn't mess up everything on the machine or the server or anywhere else, but these AI chatbots are basically peaceful little animals, right?

wrote:

- Is there a way to get an atom version of the “for-you” feed? I’m guessing this is complicated by needing to be authenticated.

replied to:

Exactly, it makes it way more complicated that's why it's not there yet. Not against the idea though.

wrote:

Another day missing Aaron Swartz.

wrote:

been building a voice first os using jev and some small voice models. I'm surprised how well it's working and I'm very close to the point where I can go into a feedback mode and tell it what behavior I want changed, it will spin up Claude or codex inside itself and setup the build to restart itself and continue with new code. tempted to let it build itself completely

replied to:

It sounds amazing! A voice first OS was also in my mind. Curious to hear more!

wrote:

Mr. Watson – Come here – I want to see you.

wrote:

I love the idea. I do miss the early twitter vibes.

wrote:

Bring back partial anterior encephalectomies

replied to:

Which part of the brain would you remove?

replied to:

It seems like removing some of the connections between the anterior and frontal cortices could have positive effects.

replied to:

I think you're perfect as you are :)

…

replied to:

^____^

wrote:

There are many distractions. Much is way too verbose. A calm, quiet and “distraction less” experience suits me better. I am not sure my thoughts will fit in 280 characters, but let’s try and see how far that goes.

wrote:

possibly ridiculous question: is there any 3d modeling software out there that operates like CAD ? (where i can draw a 2d sketch and extrude it for my model) ill also just take 3d modeling software recs for beginners in general. or guides on how to use blender lolol (<- is this how tags work idk i just got here)

replied to:

maybe try fusion 360 its free for personal use. Onshape is browser based you can try it too.

replied to:

will look into fusion 360 ty!

wrote:

This #tome about #Tcl/Tk has me re-evaluating my plans to move to the woods to be a carpenter hermit. Now I want to move to the woods and be a programmer hermit.

wrote:

i made it is an open-source version of grammarly that uses chatgpt, grok subscription or even then already local apple intelligence models.

replied to:

looks great!

replied to:

thanks mate.

Any conversation