I find myself building bespoke tooling for my own and workflows these days, not only because of the obvious reason of software being so much cheaper to build, but also because there are SO MANY options for solving any given problem that it feels impossible to evaluate all of them.
If it's not a crucial piece of tech for a work problem then it often feels like paving my own way is both cheaper mentally (kind of amazing that's true these days) and probably a better fit.
Any conversation
It will become increasingly harder to find niche markets for software when those people can just build it themselves exactly how they want it. In the end, people want to accomplish tasks, and the AI is going to be building the software on-the-fly exactly for that task, why do we need generic software that may or may not be a fit?
Yeah. It makes me think that protocols for exchanging data between apps will become even more important in that landscape. But maybe, not - maybe each exchange is another bespoke AI-driven implementation?
Protocols, infrastructure, containers, those kinds of things. I was actually playing around with an idea for a minimal markup language + runtime that can be utilized by AI to spin up apps more easily, and brainstorming it with ChatGPT, I have a feeling something like that will appear soon to complement MCP.
Introduced an MCP server this morning for the app I'm working on (getonmain.com), based on a user request. Curious to see how/if folks use it.
morning doodle of Vulpes.
ibb.co/WN48DSt3
@fastidiousprofilefollow
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyerswrote:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyerswrote:A โsmallโ visit to Lotte, and $239 later, we are enjoying rambutans, sticky rice with tuna wrapped in seaweed, and wife struggles to make room for the rest of the goodies.
รrdekes ez a 4, 2-es irodalmi, valamint programozรกsi hagyomรกny, amire Douglas Adams hรญvta fel a figyelmet, nรกlam ebbลl a hagyomรกnybรณl 4 a pszichiรกtriai, 2 a rehabilitรกciรณs tรฉma, ami รฉrdekes mรณdon maga is 4, 2-es, ami olyan, mintha rekurzรญv kezdene lenni, de mรฉgsem az teljesen www.textlog.hu/a-4-adel-es-2-szuzett/
This 4, 2 literary and programming tradition, which Douglas Adams drew attention to, is interesting. In my case, 4 of this tradition are psychiatric and 2 are rehabilitation topics, which is interestingly itself a 4, 2, which seems to be starting to be recursive, but it is not completely www.textlog.hu/a-4-adel-es-2-szuzett/
Hi ha dies que em demano si no hauria d'escriure en catalร aquรญ, per tal que hi hagi mรฉs diversitat lingรผรญstica visible. Al cap i a la fi, avui en dia les traduccions sรณn econรฒmiques. La traducciรณ automร tica pot ajudar a preservar la diversitat lingรผรญstica del mรณn.
There are days when I wonder if I shouldn't write in Catalan here, so that there is more visible linguistic diversity. After all, translations are cheap these days. Machine translation can help preserve the world's linguistic diversity.