hello world!
Any conversation
รrdekes ez a 4, 2-es irodalmi, valamint programozรกsi hagyomรกny, amire Douglas Adams hรญvta fel a figyelmet, nรกlam ebbลl a hagyomรกnybรณl 4 a pszichiรกtriai, 2 a rehabilitรกciรณs tรฉma, ami รฉrdekes mรณdon maga is 4, 2-es, ami olyan, mintha rekurzรญv kezdene lenni, de mรฉgsem az teljesen www.textlog.hu/a-4-adel-es-2-szuzett/
This 4, 2 literary and programming tradition, which Douglas Adams drew attention to, is interesting. In my case, 4 of this tradition are psychiatric and 2 are rehabilitation topics, which is interestingly itself a 4, 2, which seems to be starting to be recursive, but it is not completely www.textlog.hu/a-4-adel-es-2-szuzett/
I still don't get how now after AI coding there's people saying that contrary to common belief code wasn't a bottleneck and I realized that when I was starting to code at 10yrs ago when I was 15 and read it in a stackoverflow comment. I thought that was the common belief and still can't believe a lot of supposed senior programmers apparently believed so.
Yes, code was never the bottleneck and of course now it never will be either. Figuring out semantic modeling of data that makes sense across business domains and figuring out the right way to use digitalization to modernize processes, and the change cultures as become possible through such work - thatโs much more bottlenecks! Code is easy; people and process is hard!
hey, here! I was a coder not so long ago, and while I search for new tags for myself, why not searching for new ways to connect with people too?
I find myself building bespoke tooling for my own and workflows these days, not only because of the obvious reason of software being so much cheaper to build, but also because there are SO MANY options for solving any given problem that it feels impossible to evaluate all of them.
If it's not a crucial piece of tech for a work problem then it often feels like paving my own way is both cheaper mentally (kind of amazing that's true these days) and probably a better fit.
It will become increasingly harder to find niche markets for software when those people can just build it themselves exactly how they want it. In the end, people want to accomplish tasks, and the AI is going to be building the software on-the-fly exactly for that task, why do we need generic software that may or may not be a fit?
Yeah. It makes me think that protocols for exchanging data between apps will become even more important in that landscape. But maybe, not - maybe each exchange is another bespoke AI-driven implementation?
Protocols, infrastructure, containers, those kinds of things. I was actually playing around with an idea for a minimal markup language + runtime that can be utilized by AI to spin up apps more easily, and brainstorming it with ChatGPT, I have a feeling something like that will appear soon to complement MCP.
My Country is On Fire
mataherry.bearblog.dev/my-country-is-on-fire/
@fastidiousprofilefollow
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyersreplied to:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyersreplied to:Many pass by me. All combined arenโt worth $0.02. ๐
@kapankatsuragiprofilefollow
I may know more about Disney History and trivia than you. Maybe, I dunno.
I write about pop culture on Super Review Time.wrote:
I may know more about Disney History and trivia than you. Maybe, I dunno.
I write about pop culture on Super Review Time.wrote:trying to revive the blogging golden days. recommend some blogs with rss feed about game, movie reviews, and animation. or comic strips, traditional or webcomic.
Recently hit 10+ years (cumulative) of being a software engineer. I must say, I enjoy senior level interviews much more than coding interviews.
Sharing a link to my music blog: crusty-metallian.net
Not a lot of content yet, it's a work in progress :)