any · textlog

If I went back in time, I would aim to become a professional footballer rather than becoming a programmer

Congratulations on the !

akkor inkább holnap sürgősen elmegyek az állatparkba

Then I'd better go to the zoo tomorrow urgently.

Hi I came back after a few weeks, it seems there were some significant updates. Is it possible to set the first click to open the note instead of reply? Anyhow, good work, hope more people join here

continued:

Also, the "write a note" button on the footer seems not working

wrote:

"Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one." - Marcus Aurelius

wrote:

This fruit is rotten. It looks so ripe and juicy but if you bite it you will see: this fruit is rotten.

wrote:

o/ bc im a old fart in a young body, i can only drink coffe at least 2 hours after waking up. So no until 10am

wrote:

This #tome about #Tcl/Tk has me re-evaluating my plans to move to the woods to be a carpenter hermit. Now I want to move to the woods and be a programmer hermit.

wrote:

i'm trying to express through a math equation the relationship between power, number of people, corruption and time. corruption = (time in a position of power * power)/number of people who have power what do you think?

wrote:

It's not clear, based on personal experience, how long - if it all - the software development field will value devs who actually enjoy the work. Most people I know are producing mostly AI work and there's an obvious skill decline that's resulted from it. 1/?

continued:

But does it matter if your boss doesn't care? Or if their boss doesn't care? If the paychecks keep coming who cares? What's the point of choosing the mountain if the "joy" just means more hours on screen that could have been spent elsewhere? 2/?

…

continued:

I got into doing dev work, because I thought it was fun to learn and do and I genuinely enjoyed hanging out with others who felt the same. Now, more than ever, I realize how few people feel the same. And, now - more than ever, I realize that no on cares if I feel that way. 3/?

continued:

Bosses and their bosses care more about tickets moved and LoC written than quality or knowledgeable employees. 4/4

replied to:

It never did. Before AI people did webslop in node.js, before that people were slopping in Java. AI changes surprisingly little.

…

replied to:

Only if you buy into the narrative that AI is "just another layer of abstraction." Which of course, it isn't.

replied to:

No, it obviously isn't that. It also isn't going to be some fantastic thing that transcends humanity either, it's just another tool.

hey guys ☺️

Hi lacie

howdy

halo :) welcome

Anybody here actively working in or has contributed to (in any capacity) conservation (be it flora or fauna)?

…

replied to:

You know, as interesting as that sounds, I wouldn't at all know where to begin with something like that. Do you have a suggestion?

replied to:

I suggest looking around your area first, perhaps there are conservation groups already. Then, select among them which one focuses on native species that are most impactful to your place. 😁

wrote:

Is open source dead? Everyone has the power now to make their own stacks of things. The people aspect of open source is dead or dying. I don't think the bunny is going back in the box.

replied to:

One nice thing about Open Source (at least for me) is different people doing the same thing in different ways and one of those happen to suit my taste perfectly. And in many cases, I won't be able to come with it myself even with Super Intelligence.

replied to:

Evgeny Morozov has pointed out that using ai through chat interfaces is based on an individualised and privatised model, which (heavily paraphrased) is inherently anti-social. With an extra layer now of people making small personalised tools, do bigger things still need teams of people who know what they’re doing? FWIW I’d like to see more sharing of vibe coded tools instead of everyone making their own more less the same ones. Mine are here: pauladams.neocities.org

…

replied to:

I don't think so. I have been using more open source software than ever before. You may argue that with LLMs I have the power to make my own stack of things, but this doesn't eliminate that I still need knowledge to properly steer an LLM to create something worthwhile. If I have no knowledge of what I intend to build, the best thing the LLM will generate is a half-assed copy of something that already exists. Which is what we have been drowning in the past couple of years.

…

continued:

AI can be a superpower in the hands of someone knowledgeable. That makes the people aspect of open source more important, not less. If you offload your curiosity and desire to learn to AI, you will be a slave to it's limitations instead of being a master of its capabilities.

replied to:

Of course not. I think it is much more relevant to ask "Is closed source dead?". Anyone can now replace a proprietary program with a vibeslopped alternative which might suit them just as well. It will have the same level of trust (ie. none) and none of the other drawbacks.

wrote:

Friday Aperitivo: martini, a magazine, and a dog by my side

wrote:

I hatw Sunday evening anxiety :(, man seriously wtf?

replied to:

:((

wrote:

a lustaság meg fél egészség

Laziness is half the health.

wrote:

Text-only websites are really AI-friendly; maybe I can chat with an agent here.

wrote:

is pretty fun. Some very nice improvements in 0.9 today.

continued:

So, I've been using this harness for a week and a half now, and what's interesting to me is that it brings a lot of things that I'd already built for myself in Pi. I built a little email system for agents to communicate, a memory system to do this "continual harness" thing of self-improvement. I know I'll move on to another harness in the future, so I'm trying to treat this like I do laptops now, and think about portability in the things I build or customize.

wrote:

did they silently decrease the subscription limits on codex? (in addition to reintroducing the 5h limit?) subscription models suck so bad when they can just change the terms and make the product shittier.

replied to:

I reached the limit also for the first time on the $100. Either that or we’re just using them more.

replied to:

ive been dual wielding 2 accounts with some fallback shenanigans. on average its enough for me, but on heavy weeks its annoying. + it feels intransparent

Any conversation